AFL siis , mitte ALF
ma olen märgand, et kui nasdaq kukub siis saast tõuseb
Lugupeetud LHV Team.
forextrade.ee korraldab tasulist 2 nädalast koolitust valuutadega kauplemiseks ,teeks ettepaneku et LHV võiks sama asja teha aktsiatega kauplema õpetamisel. Kuna teil kogemused ja oleks hea kellegi käe all õppida. Mis arvate?
forextrade.ee korraldab tasulist 2 nädalast koolitust valuutadega kauplemiseks ,teeks ettepaneku et LHV võiks sama asja teha aktsiatega kauplema õpetamisel. Kuna teil kogemused ja oleks hea kellegi käe all õppida. Mis arvate?
hehheee... kesse õpetaja oleks??
ostavad abesikilt teenust sisse;)
Kui LHV 's saab trader konto avada min. 5000 USD ,siis millise brokeri juures on min. vara nõue kõige väiksem ,et saaks alustada? Oskab keegi aidata? Tänan!
Ma kusagil internetis surfates sattusin reklaami peale, kus lubati Forexil alustada ükskõik mis summaga, peaasi, et tagatisraha piiri ületab.
Siin ka juttu üldiselt, kuidas maaklerit valida:
http://www.businesspundit.com/how-to-choose-an-online-broker-and-invest-online/
http://www.businesspundit.com/how-to-choose-an-online-broker-and-invest-online/
:)
Rehatrader, tal oli ka kõik imelihtne. On elus?
Rehatrader, tal oli ka kõik imelihtne. On elus?
jumal kui kahju, ma olen 4 aastat mingi jamaga tegelenud, häbi Nelli, et seda niikaua varjasid:(
WSJ kribab, et aeg on nüüd nii kaugel, et on tekkinud mõned kohad kus tavainimene saab kvantitatiiv-kauplemist (Quantitative Trading) proovida, kodust lahkumata. Mõtled välja strateegia, koostad käsud ja platvormil teostatakse need. Riske on.
For years, ordinary people could only watch, or pay quant funds’ hefty management fees. Now, they are getting in the game. Websites, e.g. Discord, books, YouTube videos offer tutorials. Hobbyists share tips on social media.
Platforms such as Composer, Alpaca.markets, QuantConnect.com have sprung up to make it easier for amateurs to trade like the pros.
Some worry that is a power most people aren’t ready to wield. It isn’t just that a few wrong keystrokes in a complex approach could bring disaster. Many also warn that exploiting quickly shifting market patterns is a challenge even for the pros. “Now retail investors can act just like their quant idols: build overly complicated models that look unbeatable until the day they go live,” said hedge-fund veteran Andrew Beer.
Trader who said his strategies returned more than 33% last year, uses Composer because of its easy-to-use AI and graphical interfaces, which obviate the need to learn conventional computer languages and allow users to see and share their strategies in the form of simple flow charts. Algorithm, for example, holds a triple-leveraged exchange-traded fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 index if the S&P 500 index has recently trended higher, and Treasury bills otherwise. Composer enables users to construct strategies from a list of 11,000+ stocks and ETFs. Its user base nearly quintupled in 2023 and now numbers in the tens of thousands.
Many users praise its simplicity. But several warned about the tax implications of wash sales and the absence of some common Wall Street risk-management tools, such as one that would automatically exit a strategy when a specified loss is reached. Some report losing money due to system glitches. Composer says system’s stability is “pretty good” even relative to big brokers and points to pre-trade risk checks that co. has installed “to make sure you’re not doing anything crazy.” Shorting stocks and trading options, penny stocks or with borrowed money are all prohibited, which “prevents most of the problems,” it said. Composer’s algorithms trade just once a day, and strategies are generally intended to run for months or longer. Many users are shooting for supersize returns with strategies that take positions in leveraged ETFs.
Some have learned costly lessons. Walter Sanders (41), said he lost 15% in a week on a strategy he found on Discord but didn’t thoroughly vet. He traced the source of his loss to 3x leveraged ETF on Chinese shares that he believes was in the strategy primarily to make it look more lucrative in backtesting. Experienced quant traders say it is easy to construct strategies that appear as if they would have profited in the past, but which are unlikely to work in the future. Warning signs incl. unrealistically high returns and underlying code that is complicated by dozens of lines of logic. “I’m slowly learning that although the backtest may be what would have happened, that doesn’t mean there’s a lot of sense to it,” said Sanders.
For years, ordinary people could only watch, or pay quant funds’ hefty management fees. Now, they are getting in the game. Websites, e.g. Discord, books, YouTube videos offer tutorials. Hobbyists share tips on social media.
Platforms such as Composer, Alpaca.markets, QuantConnect.com have sprung up to make it easier for amateurs to trade like the pros.
Some worry that is a power most people aren’t ready to wield. It isn’t just that a few wrong keystrokes in a complex approach could bring disaster. Many also warn that exploiting quickly shifting market patterns is a challenge even for the pros. “Now retail investors can act just like their quant idols: build overly complicated models that look unbeatable until the day they go live,” said hedge-fund veteran Andrew Beer.
Trader who said his strategies returned more than 33% last year, uses Composer because of its easy-to-use AI and graphical interfaces, which obviate the need to learn conventional computer languages and allow users to see and share their strategies in the form of simple flow charts. Algorithm, for example, holds a triple-leveraged exchange-traded fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 index if the S&P 500 index has recently trended higher, and Treasury bills otherwise. Composer enables users to construct strategies from a list of 11,000+ stocks and ETFs. Its user base nearly quintupled in 2023 and now numbers in the tens of thousands.
Many users praise its simplicity. But several warned about the tax implications of wash sales and the absence of some common Wall Street risk-management tools, such as one that would automatically exit a strategy when a specified loss is reached. Some report losing money due to system glitches. Composer says system’s stability is “pretty good” even relative to big brokers and points to pre-trade risk checks that co. has installed “to make sure you’re not doing anything crazy.” Shorting stocks and trading options, penny stocks or with borrowed money are all prohibited, which “prevents most of the problems,” it said. Composer’s algorithms trade just once a day, and strategies are generally intended to run for months or longer. Many users are shooting for supersize returns with strategies that take positions in leveraged ETFs.
Some have learned costly lessons. Walter Sanders (41), said he lost 15% in a week on a strategy he found on Discord but didn’t thoroughly vet. He traced the source of his loss to 3x leveraged ETF on Chinese shares that he believes was in the strategy primarily to make it look more lucrative in backtesting. Experienced quant traders say it is easy to construct strategies that appear as if they would have profited in the past, but which are unlikely to work in the future. Warning signs incl. unrealistically high returns and underlying code that is complicated by dozens of lines of logic. “I’m slowly learning that although the backtest may be what would have happened, that doesn’t mean there’s a lot of sense to it,” said Sanders.
"opex"
WSJ kribab, et aeg on nüüd nii kaugel, et on tekkinud mõned kohad kus tavainimene saab kvantitatiiv-kauplemist (Quantitative Trading) proovida, kodust lahkumata. Mõtled välja strateegia, koostad käsud ja platvormil teostatakse need. Riske on.
Kuskil istuvad ilmselt juba next-level vennad, kes söödavaid neid tavainimeste kokku krutitud strateegiaid oma AI õpiprogrammi ja annavad sellele ülesande töötada välja counter-stategy, kuidas neid amatöörstrateege kõige tõhusamalt lüpsta. :P
Parim strateegia on see, valid omale kümmekond sarnast stokki jälgimiseks välja, kui juba 4-5 neist ajama panevad, siis hüppad mõnele viimasele pardale ja sõidad. AI-d ainult võimendavad seda strateegiat, kui nad selle selgeks õpivad.