GAAP vs mitte-GAAP kasumite vahe käriseb

Buffet kirjutab enda 2015 kirjas

In the GAAP-compliant figures we show on page 38, amortization charges of $1.1 billion have been
deducted as expenses.



I suggest that you ignore a portion of GAAP amortization costs. But it is with some trepidation that I do
that, knowing that it has become common for managers to tell their owners to ignore certain expense items that are
all too real. “Stock-based compensation” is the most egregious example. The very name says it all: “compensation.”
If compensation isn’t an expense, what is it? And, if real and recurring expenses don’t belong in the calculation of
earnings, where in the world do they belong?



Our public reports of earnings will, of course, continue to conform to GAAP. To embrace reality, however,
you should remember to add back most of the amortization charges we report



Though we sold no Kraft Heinz shares, “GAAP” (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) required us
to record a $6.8 billion write-up of our investment upon completion of the merger. That leaves us with our
Kraft Heinz holding carried on our balance sheet at a value many billions above our cost and many billions
below its market value, an outcome only an accountant could love.